Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Mossman-Yarnelle Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 8, 1938No. 15,941PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

— This cause of action originated before the Industrial Board of Indiana, wherein Mabel T. Fisher, as widow of Curtis L. Fisher, deceased, and as guardian for Curtis W. Fisher, a minor son, filed claim for compensation, as dependents, against appellee, Mossman-Yarnelle Company, for the death of Curtis L. Fisher, by a claimed accident alleged to have arisen out of and in the course of his employment. The Mossman-Yarnelle Company filed a special answer challenging the jurisdiction of the Industrial Board to hear said claim. The special answer was set for hearing and, after the conclusion of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Barr v. SumnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Matter of Johnson v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. Wynn v. Southern Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Calkins v. Service Spring Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1937
  5. Claim of Jakeway v. John F. Bauer Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shelby Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. HarrisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Kettner v. JayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. Elkhart Sawmill Co. v. SkinnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. Finkel v. Onli-Wa Fixture Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. MaherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API