Claim of Craciola v. Lewis
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtVan Kirk, P. J.
The business being carried on when claimant received his injuries was “ pea business.” The employers were accustomed to hire women, who were allowed to bring their young children with them. Otherwise they could not leave their homes and remain away for the picking season. They did in fact bring children of tender years, who needed the mother’s care and attention. The claimant was six years of age. With the other children he was accustomed to play about in the fields where his mother was worldng. Sometimes a young child would pick peas and put them in the mother’s basket. This child did. Such…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ferro v. Leopold Sinsheimer Estate, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Claim of Gifford v. T. G. Patterson, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Claim of Anthus v. Rail Joint Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- Claim of Jakeway v. John F. Bauer Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Matter of Anthus v. . the Rail Joint CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Claim of Bollard v. EngelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Feldhut v. LathamNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
- Diaz v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1932
- Amend v. AmendNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Ferraro v. ZurcherNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.