Legal Opinion

Claim of Kass v. Hirschberg, Schutz & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 11, 1920PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Hirschberg, Schütz & Company, from a decision and award of the State Industrial Commission, entered in the office of said Commission on the 9th day of July, 1919.

1Opinion of the Court

Woodward, J.:

The State Industrial Commission has made conclusions of fact that “ On March 17, 1919, the day on which Saul Kass sustained the injuries which resulted in his death on that date, he resided at No. 690 Willoughby avenue, Brooklyn, New York, and was employed as a traveling salesman by Hirschberg, Schütz & Company with principal office and place of business at No. 29 East 21st street, New York city; said company being engaged in the manufacture and sale of wholesale dress trimmings.” The evidence, which is undisputed, is that the decedent on the 15th day of March, 1919, while…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Madden's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Claim of Alpert v. J. C. & W. E. PowersNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Matter of Dose v. . Moehle Lithographic Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stansberry v. Monitor Stove Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  2. Harivel v. Hall-Thompson Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  3. Patton v. PattonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  4. Claim of Harby v. Marwell Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  5. Claim of Jakeway v. John F. Bauer Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API