Matter of Davidson v. Pansy Waist Company
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
While it may be that at the time the claimant sustained his injuries he was making himself ready to perform his regular daily work as a salesman, such preparation cannot be said to be part of his employ ment and it does not appear that he might not have prepared himself in exactly the same way if engaged in any other employment or vocation. The injury did not arise out of and in the course of his employment.
Orders reversed and claim dismissed, with costs against State Industrial Board.
His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ., concur.
Orders reversed, etc.
2Cited by24 opinions
- Souza's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Claim of Davis v. Newsweek MagazineNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Matter of Giliotti v. Hoffman Catering Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Matter of Pisko v. MintzNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Mulready v. University Research Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.