Legal Opinion
Claim of Harby v. Marwell Bros.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 24, 1922PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Van Kirk, J.:
The deceased was a traveling man, working on commission, for Harwell Brothers, Inc., wholesale grocers. He was killed on December 2, 1921. The question is whether he received the injuries which caused death while in the course of his employment; and this presents the question, when did his work begin? The case is quite different from those cases where the claimant had a located place of employment and did not begin his work until he reached that place. Deceased’s home was in Arlington,' N. J., and he was accustomed to return home each night. He sold to jobbers in Jersey City,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of Hospers v. . J. Hungerford Smith CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Claim of Kass v. Hirschberg, Schutz & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- Claim of Hospers v. J. Hungerford-Smith Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- People ex rel. Conners v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Claim of Roberts v. J. F. Newcomb & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
3Cited by14 opinions
- Matter of Bennett v. Marine Works, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Frank Lyon Co. v. OatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
- Gibbs v. R. H. Macy & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Claim of Jakeway v. John F. Bauer Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Kimball's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.