Breland & Whitten v. Breland
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
We are called upon to determine whether one away from home on business is entitled to recover workmen’s compensation benefits for injuries received as the result of falling in the bathtub at a time of day prior to entry into the actual discharge of his duties. It so happens that the claimant is a distinguished and honorable member of the legal profession.
The matter was presented to the Commission on an agreed statement of facts. The Commission allowed compensation, and on appeal to the circuit court, the circuit court affirmed the Commission.
There are no controverted facts. It, therefore,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- PERSONS v. StokesMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
- Matter of Davidson v. Pansy Waist CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Claim of Jakeway v. John F. Bauer Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Gibbs Steel Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
- Matter of Turner v. Cathedral Publishing Company, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Big" 2" Engine Rebuilders v. FreemanMississippi Supreme Court · 1980
- Mulready v. University Research Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Estate of Brown v. Pearl River ValleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
- Financial Institute Ins. Service v. HoyCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2000
- Smith v. GardnerDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1998