Legal Opinion

King v. Lennen

California Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1959No. L. A. 25591PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

Plaintiffs brought this action for damages for the wrongful death of their son, Boyd, who drowned in defendants’ swimming pool. A general demurrer to the complaint was sustained without leave to amend, and plaintiffs have appealed from the ensuing judgment.

The allegations of the complaint may be summarized as follows: Defendants’ property was located on the northwest corner of an intersection, and they maintained an artificial swimming pool on the premises about 30 feet from one of the streets. Along that street defendants had partially constructed. a concrete block wall with an opening four…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Peters v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Courtell v. McEachenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Beeson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Reynolds v. WillsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Melendez v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. O'Keefe v. South End Rowing ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Pocholec v. GIUSTINAOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Lohrenz v. LaneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  4. Bosin v. Oak Lodge Sanitary District No. 1Oregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Beard v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1970

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API