Demmer v. City of Eureka
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.
Plaintiff appeals from the judgments entered in favor of both defendants upon the failure of the plaintiff to amend his complaint within the time allowed after the trial court'sustained general and special demurrers filed by each of the defendants. In view of the holding here that the general demurrers were properly sustained, it is unnecessary to consider the questions raised with respect to the special demurrers.
The salient points set forth by the appellant in his complaint, which is in three counts, are substantially as follows: In 1934 the defendant city of Eureka graded and improved…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Peters v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Crane v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Beeson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Schmidt v. BauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- George v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Reynolds v. WillsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Holmes v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Ward v. Oakley Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Ashley v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Knight v. Kaiser Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.