Cahill v. E. B. & A. L. Stone & Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The defendants separately demurred to the complaint, upon the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The demurrers were sustained without leave to amend, judgment was given for the defendants thereon and plaintiff appeals.
The action is to recover damages for injuries sustained, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendants. The only questions presented are whether or not the ‘ facts show that the defendants were chargeable with neglect of any duty owing by them to plaintiff, and whether or not the facts stated show that the neglect of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Peters v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Barrett v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- Twist v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Loftus v. DehailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Studer v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Pierce v. United Gas and Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Beeson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Cahill v. E. B. & A. L. Stone Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Giannini v. CampodonicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Hale v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.