Legal Opinion

Custer v. Coward

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 15, 2008No. A08A1104PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge.

After their five-year-old daughter Mikayla was bitten by a dog owned by Joffery and Latoya Coward, Christopher and Shelley Custer brought the current action, seeking compensatory and punitive damages. They now appeal from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment to the Cowards. The Custers argue that the trial court erred in (1) holding that the dog’s prior act of aggression did not place the appellees on notice of the likelihood that the dog would bite someone; (2) finding that the appellees could not be liable because the dog had not actually bitten someone before the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Osowski v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  2. Hamilton v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  3. Raith v. BlanchardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. Green v. Raw Deal, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Tyner v. Matta-TroncosoSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  2. Steagald v. EasonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  3. Stennette v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. Abundant Animal Care, LLC v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  5. Steven Oliver v. Henry W. CookCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API