Legal Opinion

Raith v. Blanchard

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 21, 2005No. A04A1612PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUFFIN, Chief Judge.

Tracey Raith sued Grady and Jennifer Blanchard for damages she allegedly sustained when the Blanchards’ dog bit her. The Blanchards subsequently moved for summary judgment. The trial court granted the motion, finding that the Blanchards lacked superior knowledge of the dog’s temperament and that Raith assumed the risk of her injuries. Raith appeals, and for reasons that follow, we reverse.

Summary judgment is appropriáte when no genuine issues of material fact remain and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. On appeal, we review a trial court’s grant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  2. Wade v. American National InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  3. Durham v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. Durham v. MasonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  5. Johnson v. KvasnyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Harris v. TatumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  2. Steagald v. EasonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  3. Stolte v. HammackCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  4. Custer v. CowardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  5. Huff v. DyerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API