Legal Opinion
Osowski v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided July 15, 2003No. A03A0562PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, Judge.
Tony Osowski filed a complaint for personal injuries allegedly sustained while he was on the property of Joseph and Teresa Smith to install cable. Osowski claimed he was injured by one of the dogs that Joseph Smith had assured him would be secured and confined while he completed his work on the premises. Osowski sought to hold the homeowners liable for their dog’s actions under either OCGA § 51-3-1 or § 51-2-7. The trial court awarded summary judgment to the Smiths. We find that the record shows the existence of material disputed facts as to whether Joseph Smith voluntarily…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stelts v. EppersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Wade v. American National InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Community Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Foster Developers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- McGinty v. GOLDENS'FOUNDRY & MACHINE COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Gustafson v. Cotton States Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Monitronics International, Inc. v. VeasleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Swicegood v. Pliva, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2008
- WELCH v. PAPPAS RESTAURANTS, INC. (Two Cases)Supreme Court of Georgia · 2023
- SHEAFFER Et Al. v. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
- Custer v. CowardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.