Legal Opinion
Tyner v. Matta-Troncoso
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided March 11, 2019No. S18G0364PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Warren, Justice.
**480On January 8, 2014, Maria Matta-Troncoso and her husband, Mario Matta ("the Mattas"), sued Michael and Lakeisha Thornton, alleging that the Thorntons were liable under OCGA § 51-2-71 for injuries that Matta-Troncoso sustained when the Thorntons' dogs attacked her as she was walking her own dogs approximately two blocks away from the Thorntons' rental house. On August 20, 2014, the Mattas amended their complaint by adding Gregory B. Tyner, the Thorntons' landlord, alleging that he was liable under OCGA § 44-7-142 for failing to keep the rental property in repair.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Sturbridge Partners, Ltd. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Goldstein, Garber & Salama, LLC v. J. B.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2017
- Colquitt v. RowlandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
- Toyo Tire North America Manufacturing, Inc. v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
- Doe v. Prudential-Bache/A.G. Spanos Realty Partners, L. P.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- WELCH v. PAPPAS RESTAURANTS, INC. (Two Cases)Supreme Court of Georgia · 2023
- McEntyre v. Sams East, IncSupreme Court of Georgia · 2022
- Anglin v. BI LO, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2022
- Anglin v. City Facilities Management (FL) LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2023
- Anglin v. City Facilities Management (FL) LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2024
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.