Legal Opinion

Steagald v. Eason

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 6, 2017No. S16G0293PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackwell, Justice.

Gary and Lori Steagald sued David, Cheryl, and Joshua Eason, alleging that the Easons failed to keep Joshua’s dog properly restrained, and asserting that the Easons, therefore, were liable under OCGA § 51-2-7 for injuries that Lori sustained when the dog attacked her as she was visiting the Eason home. The Easons filed a motion for summary judgment, contending that the Steagalds had no evidence that the Easons had reason to know the dog to be vicious or dangerous and, therefore, in need of restraint. The trial court granted that *718motion, the Steagalds appealed, and in…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Munroe v. Universal Health Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  2. Harvey v. BuchananSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Nguyen v. Southwestern Emergency Physicians, P.C.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2015
  4. Sinclair v. FriedlanderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  5. Hamilton v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Tyner v. Matta-TroncosoSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  2. S&S TOWING & RECOVERY, LTD v. CHARNOTASupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
  3. MAYNARD v. SNAPCHAT, INCSupreme Court of Georgia · 2022
  4. McEntyre v. Sams East, IncSupreme Court of Georgia · 2022
  5. WEINSTEIN v. HOLMES Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API