Legal Opinion
United States v. The J. B. Williams Company, Inc., and Parkson Advertising Agency, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 2, 1974No. 236, Docket 73-1624PublishedCited by 123 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge:
On November 28, 1969, the Federal Trade Commission made a certificate to the Attorney General pursuant to § 16 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. § 56. The Commission’s letter stated it had reason to believe The J. B. Williams Company (Williams) and Park-son Advertising Agency, Inc. (Parkson) were liable for penalties under § 5 (i) of the Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(1) 1 for violation of a cease and desist order for which the Sixth Circuit had granted enforcement, J. B. Williams Co. v. FTC, 6 Cir., 381 F.2d 884 (1967), and recommended that the Attorney General…
2Cases cited89 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by123 opinions
- Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Adam G. Nunez v. The Superior Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- State v. O'Neill Investigations, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Kimmelman v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- United States v. Hodges X-Ray, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.