Legal Opinion

Tull v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 28, 1987No. 85-1259PublishedCited by 1,006 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan

The question for decision is whether the Seventh Amendment guaranteed petitioner a right to a jury trial on both liability and amount of penalty in an action instituted by the Federal Government seeking civil penalties and injunc-tive relief under the Clean Water Act, 62 Stat. 1155, as amended, 33 U. S. C. § 1251 et sea.

I — I

The Clean Water Act prohibits discharging, without a permit, dredged or fill material into “navigable waters,” including the wetlands adjacent to the waters. 33 U. S. C. §§1311, 1344, and 1362(7); 33 CFR §§323.2(a)(1)-(7) (1986). “Wetlands” are “swamps, marshes, bogs and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,006 opinions

  1. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  4. Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987

1,001 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API