Legal Opinion

United States v. Hodges X-Ray, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 18, 1985No. 84-5316PublishedCited by 120 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge.

Defendants Hodges X-Ray, Inc. and James J. Hodges appealed from the grant of summary judgment in favor of the United States, wherein the court assessed $20,-500 in civil penalties against each defendant for violations of certain Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations. The assessments were predicated upon the finding of the court below that x-ray equipment manufactured by the defendants 1 failed to comply with 21 C.F.R. § 1020.31(a)(1), which requires a display of exposure time on the control panel in seconds, and 21 C.F.R. § 1020.31(a)(2), which mandates that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MilhollinSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Perma Research and Development Company v. The Singer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  5. United States v. ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by120 opinions

  1. MISC Berhad v. Advanced Polymer Coatings, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2015
  2. Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental Management v. RLG, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. City of Newburgh v. SARNADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  4. Yanacos v. LAKE COUNTY, OHDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1996
  5. Celentano v. RocqueSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API