Legal Opinion
Kimmelman v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided July 22, 1987PublishedCited by 153 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
GARIBALDI, J.
This case requires us to determine the scope and applicability of the civil remedies set forth in N.J.S.A. 56:9-10c for violations of the New Jersey Antitrust Act (the “Antitrust Act” or “Act”), N.J.S.A. 56:9-1 to -19.
I
The Attorney General filed a civil complaint against Henkels & McCoy; Inc. (H & M), Straco Corporation Co. (Straco), Agabiti Bros., Inc. (Agabiti), and Armando Agabiti, alleging that they had violated N.J.S.A. 56:9-3 1 by conspiring to rig bids, fix prices, and allocate territories for certain construction work performed for…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Lopez v. SwyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by153 opinions
- Merin v. MaglakiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Alan J. Cornblatt, PA v. BarowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- In re Return of Weapons to J.W.D.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- GE Solid State, Inc v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Young v. Schering Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
148 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.