Legal Opinion

Slezak v. Ousdigian

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 16, 1961No. 38,052PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nelson, Justice.

This action purports to be a class action on behalf of the membership of the Public Employees Retirement Association, an association governed by Minn. St. c. 353. The plaintiffs are June Slezak, Mark C. Erspamer, Paul Ravenscraft, Lawrence H. Furcht, and George Ruoms.

The action is against O. M. Ousdigian, who is the duly appointed and acting secretary of said association and has been for many years, and the complaint indicates that the suit is directed against him in his capacity as secretary.

The complaint alleges that this is a class action and that the plaintiffs are…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Spiess v. BrandtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. State Ex Rel. Smith v. HavelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  3. Gibbs v. Minneapolis Fire Department Relief Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  4. Starkweather v. BlairSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  5. Martin v. WolfsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Hoang Minh Ly v. NystromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Christensen v. Minneapolis Municipal Employees Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. State Ex Rel. Derryberry v. Kerr-McGee CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  4. Sylvestre v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  5. Head v. Special School District No. 1Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API