Legal Opinion

Sylvestre v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 14, 1973No. 44224 through 44228, 44230PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knutson, Chief justice.

These cases, consolidated for trial and consolidated here for review, involve actions brought by District Judges J. H. Sylves-tre, Harold E. Flynn, Paul J. Jaroscak, J. K. Underhill, Levi M. Hall, and Arnold C. Forbes, seeking declaratory judgments that Ex. Sess. L. 1967, c. 38, and L. 1969, c. 987, which amended Minn. St. 490.102 regarding judges’ retirement, are unconstitutional as applied to them. The cases were submitted on stipulated facts.

Retirement laws for district court judges were comprehensively revised and recoded by L. 1949, c. 640. Since that time they…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Indiana Ex Rel. Anderson v. BrandSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. O'MALLEY v. WoodroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Hickey v. Pittsburgh Pension BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Gibbs v. Minneapolis Fire Department Relief Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  5. Hartung v. BillmeierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. McGrath v. Rhode Island Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  2. Feges v. Perkins Restaurants, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. Parker v. WakelinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  4. AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 & 96, AFL-CIO v. SundquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Christensen v. Minneapolis Municipal Employees Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API