Legal Opinion

Christensen v. Minneapolis Municipal Employees Retirement Board

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 18, 1983No. C7-82-601PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONETT, Justice.

This appeal raises the question of whether a retired public employee’s pension may be discontinued by an act of the legislature changing the eligibility requirements. The trial court, believing itself bound by earlier decisions of this court characterizing a government pension as a gratuity, held that the legislature was not prohibited by the constitution from imposing, as to employees already retired, an age requirement of 60 years before benefits could be paid where previously there had been no age requirement. We conclude that the gratuity approach no longer accurately…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Grouse v. Group Health Plan, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Eklund v. Vincent Brass and Aluminum Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  2. AFSCME Councils 6, 14, 65 & 96, AFL-CIO v. SundquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Pineman v. OechslinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. Cohen v. Cowles Media Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  5. Hertz Corp. v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API