Legal Opinion
Martin v. Wolfson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 15, 1944No. 33,769PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Streissguth, Justice.
Plaintiff, employed by defendants as manager and housekeeper of an apartment hotel, recovered a verdict for overtime Avages due her under minimum Avage order No. 13 adopted by the industrial commission in 1938 under authority of L. 1913, c. 547, as amended by L. 1921, c. 84, and L. 1923, c. 153, Minn. St. 1941, § 177.01, et seq. (Mason St. 1927, § 4210, et seq.). 2 By her appeal from an order granting defendants judgment notwithstanding the verdict, plaintiff seeks to restore the verdict against defendants’ claim that the wage order is void because irregularly adopted.
The…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Dragan v. Connecticut Medical Examining BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Rivera v. Division of Industrial WelfareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- State v. Lopez-RiosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Toomer v. Iowa Department of Job ServiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
- Thomas v. RambergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.