Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Smith v. Haveland

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 27, 1946No. Nos. 34,326, 34,373PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Consolidated for the purpose of appellate review, we have two appeals, one from an order sustaining respondent Haveland’s demurrer to relator’s amended petition for an alternative writ of mandamus, and the other from a judgment, entered pursuant to an order overruling relator’s demurrer to intervener’s complaint, which judgment quashed relator’s amended alternative writ of mandamus and dismissed the proceeding as to intervener.

In amendment of Mason St. 1927, §§ 2337 to 2349, the legislature enacted L. 1943, c. 596, § 2, providing for the exemption from taxation of $1,000 in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Seiz v. Citizens Pure Ice Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  3. State Ex Rel. Clinton Falls Nursery Co. v. County of SteeleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. State ex rel. Lum v. ArchibaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  5. County Board of Education for Unorganized Territory v. BorgenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Walker v. MunroWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Kahn v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  3. Lee v. DelmontSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  4. Arens v. Village of RogersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  5. Gordon v. FollowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API