State Ex Rel. Derryberry v. Kerr-McGee Corporation
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Justice.
The main issue to be decided on an appeal is whether there was consideration for the dismissal with prejudice filed in the district court of Oklahoma County of the State “asphalt price fixing case”. Appellant (Derryberry) argues that there was no consideration for the dismissal and therefore it was not within the lawful authority of the attorney general. Appellees (Oil Companies) assert that the Attorney General had lawful authority to compromise the case and that lawful and adequate consideration supported the settlement agreement. The question of actual or constructive fraud…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Matson v. MargiottiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Mundy v. McDonaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Wilentz v. HendricksonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
- Commonwealth v. KozlowskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- State v. FinchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- State of Florida Ex Rel. Robert L. Shevin, Attorney General, Plaintiff v. Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Nealis v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Hargrave v. Canadian Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- State v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Manchin v. BrowningWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.