Arctic Dairy Co. v. Winans
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
I think Mr. Justice WIEST'S construction of the statutory exception is too narrow. A statute should be construed so as to accomplish its obvious purpose. City of Grand Rapids v.Crocker, 219 Mich. 178. Nothing should prevent such a result if it can be attained without doing violence to the language used in the enactment.
The statute (3 Comp. Laws 1929, §§ 16667-16672) does not provide that the exception therein made applies only to "an ancillary covenant by a transferor." Instead the exception expressly provides that the statute shall not apply "where the only object or restraint imposed by the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Grand Rapids v. CrockerMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Monaghan v. Agricultural Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Sanford v. HuxfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Buckhout v. WitwerMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Larson v. JensenMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Plastray Corporation v. ColeMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Sineath v. . KatzisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Sineath v. KatzisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- LeMaine v. SealsWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Stoia v. MiskinisMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.