Legal Opinion

Arctic Dairy Co. v. Winans

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1934No. Docket No. 40, Calendar No. 37,230PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I think Mr. Justice WIEST'S construction of the statutory exception is too narrow. A statute should be construed so as to accomplish its obvious purpose. City of Grand Rapids v.Crocker, 219 Mich. 178. Nothing should prevent such a result if it can be attained without doing violence to the language used in the enactment.

The statute (3 Comp. Laws 1929, §§ 16667-16672) does not provide that the exception therein made applies only to "an ancillary covenant by a transferor." Instead the exception expressly provides that the statute shall not apply "where the only object or restraint imposed by the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Grand Rapids v. CrockerMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Monaghan v. Agricultural Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Sanford v. HuxfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Buckhout v. WitwerMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Larson v. JensenMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Plastray Corporation v. ColeMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Sineath v. . KatzisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Sineath v. KatzisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. LeMaine v. SealsWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Stoia v. MiskinisMichigan Supreme Court · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API