Legal Opinion

Larson v. Jensen

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1884PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to Manistee. (Judkins, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

The plaintiff claimed that he entered into an agreement with defendant by which he was to furnish *428and deliver to one John Labonta an unlimited amount of merchandise, as he, Labonta, might call for, or order by mail, or otherwise; and defendant was to pay plaintiff for all the goods so ordered or called for by Labonta; that in pursuance of that agreement plaintiff delivered goods to Labonta, from time to time, at the request of defendant, ■ and, at the time this action was brought, plaintiff claimed a balance due him of about four hundred dollars. On the trial the plaintiff gave evidence…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Foster v. . PerschNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Ruggles v. GattonIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Champion v. DotyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Barrett v. McHughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. May v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Arctic Dairy Co. v. WinansMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Kesler and Dodson v. CheadleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  4. Waldock v. First Nat. Bank of IdabelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. City of Highland Park v. Grant-Mackenzie Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API