Legal Opinion

Sineath v. Katzis

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 8, 1941PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal oe DEFENDANTS, Katzis and White.

Winboene, J.

The questions raised by the appealing defendants pertain to the refusal of the court to grant their respective motions for judgment as in case of nonsuit and to set aside the verdict on the second, third and fourth issues. The rulings below in regard thereto are consonant with our views.

These appellants base their challenge upon two grounds:

1. That as the good will sold by the Goldsboro Dry Cleaners and Hatters, Inc., to plaintiffs Sineath and Hearon was not the property of defendant Katzis, the sale of it constituted no sufficient valuable…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Haskins v. RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  2. Kramer v. . OldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  3. Campbell v. Everhart.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Beam v. . RutledgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Bowen v. Fidelity BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Childress v. AbelesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Jewel Box Stores Corporation v. MorrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Perkins v. LangdonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Robbins v. C. W. Myers Trading Post, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Harwell Enterprises, Inc. v. HeimSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API