Legal Opinion

Sanford v. Huxford

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1875PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error to Calhoun Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell, J:

Suit was brought below on an agreement by defendants to furnish to Jesse Crowell the value of a certain house formerly owned by him, or means to buy it, and also money enough to support him. The alleged consideration rvas his withdrawal of opposition to certain bankruptcy proceedings pending against his firm, and consent to amendments and ah adjudication against them. A separate count contained the averment of an additional agreement to procure the withdrawal of opposition by the other partners.

The facts averred are set forth substantially as follows: On the 3d day of February,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Union Bank of Georgetown v. GearySupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  2. Moore v. Detroit Locomotive WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Morey v. Town of NewfaneNew York Supreme Court · 1850
  4. Farmers' Bank of Amsterdam v. BlairNew York Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Prater v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Wood v. . RabeNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Plastray Corporation v. ColeMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Matter of Cliff's Ridge Skiing Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1991
  4. Coleman v. the Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
  5. Arctic Dairy Co. v. WinansMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API