Legal Opinion

Stoia v. Miskinis

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1941No. Docket No. 1, Calendar No. 41,544PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

This case is a bill in chancery for specific performance of a covenant by the vendors in a buy-and-sell agreement not to compete against the vendees therein by “owning, operating or managing theaters” for a certain period and within a certain area. The suit was started July 1, 1940, by J oseph and Victoria Stoia against J oseph and Mary Miskinis, their son Joseph, Jr., and Philip Goreliek. Since that time other parties plaintiff and defendant have been added, as will appear later. Complexity of the facts in the case makes an extended statement necessary.

Joseph and Victoria Stoia and Joseph…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Kramer v. . OldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  3. Sineath v. KatzisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Colton v. DuvallMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Weickgenant v. EcclesMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Coates v. Bastian Brothers, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Innovation Ventures, LLC v. Custom Nutrition Labs., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  3. Follmer, Rudzewicz & Co. v. KoscoMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Yost v. PatrickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  5. ARA Chuckwagon of Detroit, Inc. v. LobertMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API