Timberidge Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Santa Rosa
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELKINGTON, J.
Sonoma County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) and Piner-Olivet Union School District (District) appeal from orders of the superior court which (1) sustained, without leave to amend, the several plaintiffs’ general demurrers to their complaints in intervention, and (2) granted plaintiffs’ motions to strike the same complaints in intervention.
The legislative body of defendant City of Santa Rosa (City) had passed a resolution adopting a “school impact fee policy” (hereafter sometimes Resolution) designed to alleviate temporary overcrowding of the City’s schools…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Klopstock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Great Lakes Properties, Inc. v. City of El SegundoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Parker v. BowronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- MacIsaac v. PozzoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Drinkhouse v. Van NessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Hensler v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Friedland v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Valley Circle Estates v. VTN Consolidated, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1983
- Selleck v. Globe International, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Dominguez v. City of AlhambraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.