Legal Opinion

Valley Circle Estates v. VTN Consolidated, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1983No. L.A. 31661PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REYNOSO, J.

Does Code of Civil Procedure section 337.15 permit a general contractor tort defendant to file a cross-complaint for equitable indemnity against a subcontractor who cannot otherwise be reached under the limitations period of the statute in a direct action for damages? We hold that such a cross-complaint for indemnity is proper.

On March 23, 1978, plaintiffs Fred M. and Ruth S. Zeleznick filed a complaint for damages to their home resulting from soil subsidence. The defendants in the suit include the general contractor, developer and seller of the residence, Valley Circle…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Babb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Rossmoor Sanitation, Inc. v. Pylon, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975
  5. County of Los Angeles v. FrisbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward-Clyde & AssociatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Lantzy v. Centex HomesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Gutierrez v. MofidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Bernson v. Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1994

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API