Valley Circle Estates v. VTN Consolidated, Inc.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REYNOSO, J.
Does Code of Civil Procedure section 337.15 permit a general contractor tort defendant to file a cross-complaint for equitable indemnity against a subcontractor who cannot otherwise be reached under the limitations period of the statute in a direct action for damages? We hold that such a cross-complaint for indemnity is proper.
On March 23, 1978, plaintiffs Fred M. and Ruth S. Zeleznick filed a complaint for damages to their home resulting from soil subsidence. The defendants in the suit include the general contractor, developer and seller of the residence, Valley Circle…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Babb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Rossmoor Sanitation, Inc. v. Pylon, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975
- County of Los Angeles v. FrisbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward-Clyde & AssociatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Lantzy v. Centex HomesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Gutierrez v. MofidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Bernson v. Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1994
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.