Legal Opinion
Friedland v. City of Long Beach
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 27, 1998No. B106721PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KITCHING, J.
Introduction
A validation action (Code Civ. Proc., § 860 et seq.) 1 allows a public agency to obtain a judgment that its financing commitments are valid, legal, and binding. If the public agency has complied with statutory requirements, the judgment in the validation action binds the agency and all other persons. The question in this appeal is whether a plaintiff can maintain a taxpayer suit filed after the period within which to appeal a judgment in a validation action has expired.
This appeal arises from a challenge to bond financing for the “Aquarium of the Pacific”…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Rider v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- City of Ontario v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- King v. Central BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Marina Tenants Ass'n v. Deauville Marina Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- McKell v. Washington Mutual, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- City of Santa Monica v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Quantification Settlement Agreement CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- McKell v. Washington Mut., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Kaatz v. CITY OF SEASIDECalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.