Legal Opinion
Sibley v. Roberts
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 19, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2016-0572PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge
The plaintiff, Montgomery Blair Sibley, seeks declaratory relief and damages arising from assertions that the defendants, former Chief Judge Richard W. Roberts and Clerk of the Court, Angela 0. Caesar, violated the plaintiffs First and Fifth Amendment rights by failing to docket two motions submitted by the plaintiff in a criminal case assigned to defendant Roberts in which the plaintiff was the prior defense attorney of record. See First Amended Complaint for Damages and Declaratory Judgment (“Am. Compl.”) at ¶¶ 5-6, 10, 15-18,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jiggetts v. CipulloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Fuller v. HarrisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Cladek v. CorriganDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Dillon-Capps v. Ohana Growth Partners, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- Jaiyeola v. NeffDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.