Legal Opinion
Cladek v. Corrigan
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 31, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2025-2066Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LYDIA CLADEK, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 25-2066 (TJK) TIMOTHY J. CORRIGAN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, sued a judge of the Middle District of Florida. She alleges that at her sentencing, Judge Timothy J. Corrigan “violat[ed]” his “legal duty under 18 U.S.C. § 1519” by “falsifying the record of sentencing . . . thereby causing the government of the United States . . . to cease to exist for the duration of Plaintiff’s sentencing proceeding . . . and thereby causing the Constitution of the United…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Michael Sindram v. John H. Suda Paul R. Webber, III Oliver P. Corbin Edward Jenkins Everett O'Quinn Frederick B. Beane, Jr. (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Sharon Rollins v. Wackenhut Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Smith v. ScaliaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- William Arthur Moore v. Warren BurgerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.