Legal Opinion

Jaiyeola v. Neff

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 16, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2024-2550Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DR. GANIYU AYINLA JAIYEOLA, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 24-cv-02550 (CRC) THE HONORABLE JANET T. NEFF and THE HONORABLE SALLY J. BERENS, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Dr. Ganiyu Ayinla Jaiyeola (“Jaiyeola”), proceeding pro se, filed this action against a district judge and a magistrate judge of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan. Jaiyeola alleges that the judges’ actions in a prior lawsuit that he brought in that district violated the Due Process Clause. See Compl. ¶¶ 20–22. For the reasons explained below, the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. American Nat. Ins. Co. v. FDICCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
  4. Settles v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  5. Thomas, Oscar v. Principi, AnthonyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API