Mireles v. Waco
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
A long line of this Court’s precedents acknowledges that, generally, a judge is immune from a suit for money damages. See, e. g., Forrester v. White, 484 U. S. 219 (1988); Cleavinger v. Saxner, 474 U. S. 193 (1985); Dennis v. Sparks, 449 U. S. 24 (1980); Supreme Court of Va. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc., 446 U. S. 719 (1980); Butz v. Economou, 438 U. S. 478 (1978); Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U. S. 349 (1978); Pierson *10v. Ray, 386 U. S. 547 (1967).1 Although unfairness and injustice to a litigant may result on occasion, “it is a general principle of the highest importance to the proper…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4,427 opinions
- McPherson v. KelseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Bliven v. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- C.A. Brokaw v. Mercer County, James Brokaw, Weir BrokawCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Mcpherson v. KelseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Antoine v. Byers & Anderson, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
4,422 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.