Rickards v. Noonan
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
This is an appeal by defendants and appellants from a judgment awarding plaintiffs and respondents, as the sole surviving heirs at law of Stewart Rickards, deceased, damages for his wrongful death.
Appellants raise no question concerning their negligence or liability to respond in damages. They contend (1) that the damage awarded is excessive; and (2) that the trial court erred in ruling upon the admissibility of certain evidence.
Respondent Doris Rickards was decedent’s wife and respondent Charles P. Rickards was decedent’s father. Trial was had before the court without a jury. It found that…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Union Sugar Co. v. Hollister Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- McGuinness v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Decou v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- McClure v. McClureCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Bartolozzi v. MallegniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Canavin v. Pacific Southwest AirlinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Salinas v. KahnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Wells, Inc. v. ShoemakeNevada Supreme Court · 1947
- Heck v. HeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Luis v. CavinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.