Legal Opinion

Wells, Inc. v. Shoemake

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1947No. 3451PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Eather, C. J.:

This action was instituted by the respondents, Flora Marie Shoemake and John Alley Shoemake by Flora Marie Shoemake, his guardian ad litem, to recover damages for the death of Kenneth C. Shoemake, who was husband and father of the respective respondents and who, at the time of his death, was twenty-nine years of age. The death was alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the appellants.

The parties will be referred to as in the court below, and to better appreciate the contentions of both parties it is necessary that we briefly state the facts.

The…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Byrne v. Kansas City, Ft. S. & M. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1894
  2. Salmon v. RathjensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Redfield v. Oakland Consolidated Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Aldrich v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Robinson v. Western States Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1920

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Wyeth v. RowattNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Miller v. SchnitzerNevada Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Johnson v. BrownNevada Supreme Court · 1959
  4. State v. WebsterNevada Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Southern Pacific Company v. WatkinsNevada Supreme Court · 1967

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API