Legal Opinion

CCM Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 14, 1988No. 599-86CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

FUTEY, Judge.

This case is presently before the court on defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment. The action arises out of a contract between the Veterans Administration and CCM Corporation to insulate and waterproof a Veterans Administration building. Plaintiff asserts that due to the delay in the project completion and the government’s failure to release the corporation’s performance bond, plaintiff was unable to perform a separate contract for the Town of Maynard, Massachusetts. Plaintiff requested compensation from the contracting officer for, inter alia, lost profits from the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  4. Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  5. Balboa Insurance Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Franklin Federal Savings Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  2. CCM Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  3. Rhen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  4. Quiman, S.A. de C.V. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  5. California Oregon Broadcasting, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API