Legal Opinion

Quiman, S.A. de C.V. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 20, 1997No. 92-442CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FUTEY, Judge.

This case is presently before this court following a trial on the merits. In this action, plaintiff is seeking compensation for an alleged breach of contract by defendant. In response, defendant contends that no enforceable contract exists between the United States and plaintiff. Further, even if an enforceable contract exists, defendant maintains that it committed no breach. In addition, even assuming that defendant breached an enforceable contract, defendant argues that plaintiff suffered no compensable damages as a result of such breach.

Factual Background

Plaintiff is a…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Trauma Service Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  3. City of El Centro v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  4. Kania v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  5. Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Peninsula Group Capital Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  2. Coast Federal Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  3. Bluebonnet Sayings Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  4. Energy Capital Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  5. Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API