Continental Casualty Co. v. Transport Indemnity Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDieterich, J.
Continental had at all times material to this action, a policy of insurance in full force and effect issued to “Kenosha Auto Transport Corp. and/or Lessors of Equipment to Kenosha Auto Transport Corp.” Both parties agree that this policy extended coverage during any “bob-tailing” operation of a truck-tractor covered by the policy *192and that the policy extended coverage to the accident here involved. (“Bobtail” is the type of operation where the tractor is driven without a trailer.)
Transport had at all times material to this action a policy of insurance in full force and effect issued to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moore v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Miller v. KujakWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Lubow v. MorrisseyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Rusch v. MielkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
- Faust v. DawesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Maas Ex Rel. Grant v. ZieglerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- Faltersack v. Vanden BoogaardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Westphal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
- Groth v. Farmers Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Great West Casualty Co. v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.