Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Co. v. Transport Indemnity Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1962PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDieterich, J.

Continental had at all times material to this action, a policy of insurance in full force and effect issued to “Kenosha Auto Transport Corp. and/or Lessors of Equipment to Kenosha Auto Transport Corp.” Both parties agree that this policy extended coverage during any “bob-tailing” operation of a truck-tractor covered by the policy *192and that the policy extended coverage to the accident here involved. (“Bobtail” is the type of operation where the tractor is driven without a trailer.)

Transport had at all times material to this action a policy of insurance in full force and effect issued to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moore v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Miller v. KujakWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Lubow v. MorrisseyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Rusch v. MielkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Faust v. DawesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Maas Ex Rel. Grant v. ZieglerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Faltersack v. Vanden BoogaardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Westphal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
  4. Groth v. Farmers Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Great West Casualty Co. v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API