Faltersack v. Vanden Boogaard
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
The question presented here is what effect the “other insurance” clause in each policy has on the ultimate liability, if any, for damages. Each company concedes that in the absence of the other’s policy it would provide coverage for the injuries sustained by Faltersaek.
Iowa National’s position is that its “escape” clause was unambiguously drawn to exclude coverage in instances where another policy provides coverage, whether by its terms the other policy is limited to excess coverage or not.
Integrity contends that its policy is not “other insurance” within the meaning of the Iowa National…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. Shelby Mutual Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Certain UnderwritersIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
- Continental Cas. Co. v. WeekesSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Federal Insurance Company v. PrestemonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Garriguenc v. LoveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- Davis v. De FrankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
- Union Insurance Co. v. Iowa Hardware Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1970
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.