Legal Opinion

Rusch v. Mielke

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1940PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

The following undisputed facts are established by affidavits upon which the appellant, London & Lancashire Indemnity Company, based its motion for summary judgment. It had issued an automobile liability indemnity policy to Ben Pludeman on a truck owned by him and which was being operated with his consent by the defendant Mary Mielke at the time of the accident which resulted in injury to plaintiff. Mary Mielke was returning to her home with the truck on a trip made for the sole purpose of taking her husband to his place of employment. In item 1 of the declarations embodied in the policy…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Drewek v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Bohnsack v. Huson-Ziegler Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Miller v. KujakWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  2. American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa. v. MorrisDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1943
  3. Continental Casualty Co. v. Transport Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Simon v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
  5. Mitchell v. Great Eastern Stages, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API