Legal Opinion

Maas Ex Rel. Grant v. Ziegler

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1992No. 90-0168PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJon P. Wilcox, J.

This case is before the court on petition for review pursuant to sec. (Rule) 809.62, Stats. Petitioners, Lorene A. Gray and Sentry Insurance (hereinafter Sentry), seek review of an unpublished court of appeals decision affirming circuit court Judge Susan Steingass's denial of their motion for summary judgment. Sentry argues that the court of appeals and trial court erred in ruling that an endorsement which removed a fellow employee exclusion from the Sentry insurance policy waived the exclusive remedy provision of the Worker's Compensation Act, sec. 102.03(2), Stats. Further, Sentry asserts…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kremers-Urban Co. v. American Employers Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Kraemer Bros. v. United States Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Stanhope v. Brown CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Voss v. City of MiddletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Gonzalez Ex Rel. Bichler v. City of FranklinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Folkman v. QuammeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of WausauWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GilletteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  4. General Casualty Co. of Wisconsin v. HillsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Gorton v. Hostak, Henzl & Bichler, S.C.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1998

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API