Lubow v. Morrissey

1. Shallock Transportation, Inc. There has been no argument on appeal that dismissal of Shallock Transportation, Inc., was erroneous. As to it, the judgment will be affirmed.

2. Defense of American Employers. Under this policy, Morrissey was an additional, or omnibus insured by reason of permission given him to use the automobile. The policy, however, limited the insurance of an additional insured as follows:

“The insurance with respect to any person or organization other than the named insured or such spouse does not apply: (1) To [1] any person or organization, or to any agent or employee…