Groth v. Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.
The issue on this appeal is whether either Milwaukee Auto or U.S.F.&G. is entirely liable under its policy for the amounts paid in settlement to the two plaintiffs, or whether each must bear a pro rata portion thereof under the “other insurance” clauses of the two policies.
The Milwaukee policy issued to plaintiff Groth contains the following “other insurance” provision:
“If the insured has other insurance against a loss covered by this policy the company shall not be liable under this policy for a greater proportion of such loss than the applicable limit of liability stated in the declarations…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Behringer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Pavelski v. RoginskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Transport Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Lubow v. MorrisseyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lukaszewicz v. Concrete Research, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Cardinal v. Leader National Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- Jones v. Medox, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Martin v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
- Nelson v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.