Legal Opinion

Groth v. Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1963PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

The issue on this appeal is whether either Milwaukee Auto or U.S.F.&G. is entirely liable under its policy for the amounts paid in settlement to the two plaintiffs, or whether each must bear a pro rata portion thereof under the “other insurance” clauses of the two policies.

The Milwaukee policy issued to plaintiff Groth contains the following “other insurance” provision:

“If the insured has other insurance against a loss covered by this policy the company shall not be liable under this policy for a greater proportion of such loss than the applicable limit of liability stated in the declarations…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Behringer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Pavelski v. RoginskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Continental Casualty Co. v. Transport Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Lubow v. MorrisseyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lukaszewicz v. Concrete Research, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Cardinal v. Leader National Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Jones v. Medox, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Martin v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Nelson v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API