Legal Opinion

Westphal v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided July 17, 2003No. 02-1343PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoggensack, J.

¶ 1. Farmers Insurance Exchange appeals an order denying its motion for sum mary judgment on a coverage defense for an automobile accident involving Eric Meadows and Evette and Tanner Westphal. The circuit court concluded there were issues of material fact as to whether the "drive other cars" exclusion applied and that the "business use" exclusion did not apply. Because we conclude that a dispute of material fact existed concerning: (1) the ownership of the pickup truck that Eric was driving at the time of the accident and (2) whether the pickup was furnished for Eric's regular use, summary…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Smith v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Peace Ex Rel. Lerner v. Northwestern National InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Donaldson v. Urban Land Interests, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Smith v. Dodgeville Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
  5. Tempelis v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Hoida, Inc. v. M & I MIDSTATE BANKWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Burbank Grease Services, LLC v. SokolowskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Acuity v. BagadiaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Ronald E. Belding, Jr. v. Deeanna L. DemoulinWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Elliot Brey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API