People v. Hagar
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Yolo, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMyrick, J.
Many of the points involved in this case are similar to points presented in Rec. Dist. Ho. 108, v. Hagar, No. 8,827, ante. Two points, however, not involved there are for consideration here.
*601. There is evidence sufficient to sustain the finding that the allegation of the complaint, that the commissioners jointly viewed the lands of the district, was true.
2. The lands of the defendant consist of many parcels, sections, fractional sections and subdivisions of sections, containing several thousand acres. The defendant offered to prove that of his lands which were assessed, 522.13 acres were…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Board of Directors of Modesto Irrigation District v. TregeaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Ross v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Central Irrigation District v. De LappeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Lower Kings River Reclamation District, No. 531 v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Reclamation District No. 551 v. RunyonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.