In re Organization & of the Bonds of the Central Irrigation District
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Glenn and from an order denying a new trial. Seth Millington, Judge. . The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This proceeding was instituted by the hoard of directors of the Central Irrigation District, under the provisions of an act of the legislature, commonly and for convenience designated the “Confirmation Act” (Stats. 1889, p. 212).
The petitioners, as the act provides they may do, set forth: 1. The proceedings leading to, and terminating in, the organization of the' irrigation district; and, 2. The proceedings attending the issue and sale of bonds of the district, and asked that these proceedings be reviewed and declared valid and legal.
Certain persons interested in the district, and owning…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Cross v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Union School Township v. National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Board of Directors of Modesto Irrigation District v. TregeaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Price v. Sixth District Agricultural Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
- In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Imperial Water Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Tide Water Associated Oil Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- People Ex Rel. Averna v. City of Palm SpringsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.