Lent v. Tillson
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
This suit was brought to enjoin the tax collector of the city and county of San Francisco from selling certain real estate, for the collection of the tax imposed for the payment of the Dupont Street bonds issued under the act of the legislature, approved March 23,1876. (Stats. 1875-76, p. 433.) That act provided for the widening of Dupont Street, but was not to go into operation until the board of supervisors should declare by resolution or order that in their judgment it was expedient to widen the street, in accordance with and in the mode prescribed by the act.
The act specifically defined…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Neal v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Matter Appl'n Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
- People v. LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- People Ex Rel. Herrick v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. GiminezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- People v. RusselCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Duncan v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.